Hopefully last night’s disappointment is no more than a blip as Liverpool continue to improve and climb the table. They have shown on Sunday that they are more than capable of producing the type of form that will allow them to challenge for a Champions’ League position, especially in a season where none of their rivals have shown themselves capable of putting together a string of victories.
Hodgson, I fear, still needs to grab the fact that he is manager of one of the biggest clubs in the country, a squad that boasts a string of internationals and down the spine of the team includes three of the best in the world in their respective positions in Reina, Gerrard and Torres. The name or aura of Liverpool does not guarantee success, and I appreciate the need to keep everyone grounded after the stirring victory against Chelsea. However, I could not help feeling underwhelmed by his statement that it was too early to start thinking about the Champions’ League and again last night that we could be satisfied with a point away from home.
It is not about the message to the supporters, but it cannot convey the right positive note to the players who need every ounce of belief that can be mustered. The bottom line is that Liverpool went into last night’s fixture just five points off the Champions’ League places despite the trauma of the early season, and I would think that any other manager in the division would have been shouting the odds about their team’s ability to close that gap.
There rarely seems to be any middle ground in football these days with each result either a debacle or a glorious victory. As it stands, I would happily have taken four points from the last two matches, albeit that I would have expected to gain those points in a different manner. The visit to Stoke becomes a key fixture now, at a ground where, as with the JJB, we have not won in the last two seasons.
The team looked flat and tired last night, and they will need to find enough drive and energy from somewhere if they are to compete on Saturday. Beyond that, it’s over to Mr Comolli to see what additions he can make to this squad in January.
Follow us on twitter @live4Liverpool
Live4Liverpool is recruiting columnists. For further info contact the site editor at editor@live4liverpool.com
Stella WDM ECLIPSE
TOP TEN LIVERPOOL MOMENTS OF THE DECADE
CLICK ON THE IMAGE OR HERE TO BEGIN THE COUNTDOWN
“Hodgson, I fear, still needs to grab the fact that he is manager of one of the biggest clubs in the country, a squad that boasts a string of internationals and down the spine of the team includes three of the best in the world in their respective positions in Reina, Gerrard and Torres. The name or aura of Liverpool does not guarantee success….”
I think he knows all to well how big a club Liverpool are, I mean, who does not know that simple fact? Trouble is, our big club has a small squad and when some of the vital players of that small squad are tired or not available, as you say, the name/aura of Liverpool is not worth Toffee (pardon the pun).
Liverpool is like a big red Ferrari filled with 95 octane fuel, it needs a decent services & better fuel vicar!
🙂
YNWA
I don’t buy the argument about crippling lack of squad depth. Yes, we don’t have the luxury of a $100m bench, but Hodgson’s not exactly dealing with a pub side either. With this squad, we had enough representatives at the world cup final to put out an entire starting XI and still have two leftover on reserves. Only one other squad in the world can boast that quality – Barcelona.
This squad is not title-quality yet, but 4th for this set of players should be the bare minimum, not an aspiration to be proud of at the end of the season (which I’m sure Roy will treat as one of Liverpool’s great victories if we achieve it). Fact is, give this set of players to another manager, and all of a sudden you’ll see that this rabble of internationals can beat Wigan again.
The size of Damien’s task is one thing. I’d say more important than that is the immediacy of John Henry’s task re: Roy Hodgson.
Hodgeson tactics work when we’re the underdogs. It’s no coincidence that Chelsea, Man U and Arsenal have been our best performance’s but in games where we have to take the game to the smaller teams those tactics don’t work.
Jovanovich and Ngog were left on the bench (and Pacheco didn’t even make it that far again) when he brought on Shelvey & Ecclestone remember – neither of which were given much chance to succeed by being played so out of position in an under-performing team.
We don’t have much of a squad for this silly 4411 formation, but we do have a squad that would suddenly look a lot stronger if we switched to a 433
Roy still insists on leaving our joint top scorer out of it. What has he got against the kid? I’d look for another club if I was Ngog. And yet again pacheco fails to make the bench even. He is not even considered good enough for a game at wigan? This is madness.
pachecco was too lightweight to play against wigan he would of been ineffective
The squad is skinny, true, but Hodgson played a big part in that by loaning out some good players. How he let Aquilani go is beyond me. It’s not as if we are blessed with an over supply of gifted, creative midfielders. In fact, Aqua is precisely the type of player that could have been injected into the game against Wigan, not the likes of the plodding Poulson. Don’t forget, to secure Konchesky – another plodder – Hodgson let go a couple of very talented reserve players. I agree with the previous comment, where’s Pacheco?? Has he been frozen out, same as Agger? God, the more I see and read of Hodgson the more I want to see the back of him. Take action, John Henry. Please.
Hodgson had said that Aquilani was too good to sit on the bench. That was the first decision that made me start questioning the common sense of our new manager. Well it looks likes he’s has got what he wants now and has nobody on the bench that he wants on the pitch
It is beyond everyone I think why Pacheco is not given an opportunity. I think the word to describe Roy’s approach at the moment should be “timid”.
I have nothing against the man who is a good coach, he is but it is about the time that he tries an approach fit of Liverpool and not of Fulham or Blackburn.
Faster we remove Roy faster we move up the table as simple as that.
apart from the occasional apologist for Roy (almost seems contrived at times) he has to be the least supported manager of LFC that I can remember. Even the days of Sourness didn’t seem as dark as this.
In pacheco and Pedro(barca) I see same player just that one is given time on the pitch to build his confidence. Things has to change or by dec LFC back in relegation zonne
we won’t be back in the relegation zone. We won’t enter this watered down title race as we should do either though 🙁
Just finished watching the dismal performance against Stoke,who as a team,showed guts,determination and the desire to play at 110% for the whole game.Not pretty,but simple effective stuff to knock over a Liverpool team who seem to have thought that after the Chelsea win that all will be ok now.LFC needs to drastically revamp the 1st team come Jan,too many so called big name stars on big salaries not performing.As in any other job,such a shame that players remuneration in football is`nt performance related.Mid table finish at best for LFC this season on this and other similar sub standard performaces.