Quantcast
View from the Kop

Why I harbour resentment towards Fernando Torres

|

But, regardless of all this, I am still very, very bitter. Why? Because, in hindsight, his attitude for the past 18 months or so has been pathetic. Yes, the team has generally been diabolical; shorn for the most part of form, confidence, and under Hodgson, ambition. But that doesn’t excuse the bickering with referees, it doesn’t excuse the petulant waggings of fingers at linesmen, the constant arguing with opposition defenders, and the complete unwillingness to, as a senior member of the side, help motivate his fellow players into improving. As of the beginning of last season, the Fernando Torres of the previous two years was largely tranformed from an utterly lethal striker (the most complete in the world on his day, I would argue) to a whinging, sulking weight on the rest of his team’s shoulders, punctuated (it must be said) with the odd goal or two. Surprisingly for someone who was made club captain of Atletico Madrid at just 19, the phrase ‘lead by example’ is absolutely nowhere to be found in the Torres lexicon.

Embittered, unfair revisionism? Maybe. But I firmly believe that if I was asked a week ago to name the defining image of Torres’ past season and a half, it would not be him nonchalantly slotting home a one-on-one, but him squabbling with an largely uninterested opposition defender, or continuing to give a mouthful to a referee while getting booked for dissent. This is not what Liverpool were paying him £100k per week to do, and it was an insult to his teammates, managers and fans, much in the way Berbatov strolling his way through his last six months at White Hart Lane – once United’s interest was confirmed – was a disgraceful show of non-gratitude towards the Spurs support. Compare Torres’ attitude to that of Pepe Reina, who never once stopped encouraging his team, no matter how badly they were playing (and boy were there some nadirs), and it is a damning indictment of the striker’s character.

So, Fernando Torres has indeed gone to Chelsea, and – in the very short term at least – will be playing in a better side, who will be far more likely to compete for the very top honours. And fair enough – it’s a short career as a footballer, and his talent deserved better than the current Liverpool. So adios, Nando, and thanks for everything. You were a truly great Liverpool player, and if you do finally win a league title, then nobody can claim that your talent doesn’t warrant it. It’s just a shame that the same can’t be said for your attitude.

Follow us on twitter @live4Liverpool

Live4Liverpool is recruiting columnists. For further info contact the site editor at live4liverpool@snack-media.com

Its live fantasy football! Become part of Liverpool v Chelsea and play Picklive for FREE. A Free Trial for every reader here

This week it is even more of Liverpool WAG Alex Curran!

————–
CLICK ON THE IMAGE OR HERE TO GET TO THE GALLERY

Share this article

13 comments

  • Stan Streason says:

    Fair article.

    Only thing I would add is that he was crap and apparently disinterested at the world cup too. Either he couldnt snap out of his Liverpool sulk, he had a real problem of some sort leading to his massive deteriation in form (which may or may not be over – we shall see in the next few months)or as you say, he has Owens desease in which case £50m is very good business indeed.

  • RoyK says:

    “You were a truly great Liverpool player”- He is a great footballer… but on his attitude, a good, not great, Liverpool player.. and certainly never a legend!

  • Dale Marlow says:

    Actually all things considered, the timing has actually been perfect, had he left for an astronomical fee under H&G, where might you suppose that money might have ended up Texas maybe?

  • John Dobson says:

    1 question – why do you persist with this idea that Chelsea have no “real history”. Do Notts County have a history – as the first league team I would have thought so – but they don’t have your trophy room. I guess we only have “new” fans. Funny how we have the 5th highest average league attendance of all time (despite far less success – at least until recently). I’m sure you’ll now point to a few games in the 80’s with crowds of less than 10k as if that represents our support over the last 106 years (not “real” years of course – otherwise we’d have a history). Maybe you should check out the 12k who packed into Anfield for a 1st round European Cup game in 1982. At least our crap crowds where in the 2nd division “when we were sh*t”. Or maybe the fact that your highest ever league attendance (25,000 below ours) was against us in the 50’s – when we clearly didn’t even properly exist. I could go on – you will probably say I already have, but you are a club we used to have respect for until we gatecrashed your trophy winning elite (we get much of the same from Arsenal) & all the bitterness spewed out. See you Sunday.

    • Alex Hess says:

      Calm down John. Your points are sound and I for the most part agree – the qualification of “rightly or wrongly” in that part of the article implies no such judgement is being made by the author, simply reflecting that it is true of many fans.

      • John Dobson says:

        I’m calm now – honest! It’s almost an automatic reaction now. I need to get out a little more.

    • Max says:

      Yes but what ever, Chelsea are cheats because they spend Romans money..

      When fifa fair rules kick in will you be able to spend 50 mill on another player? NO

      You will be psending what you earn profit, about 20 mill per year I reckon..

  • Andy says:

    As a Chelsea fan i would like to say, compared to sum i have read recently this is an articulated account of the Torres transfer, albeit with the exclusion of the announcement of Torres’s intention before Suarez committing, engineered by LFC….much as the others have also.
    However, i guess this whole episode has highlighted a real geographical/demographical difference between the two areas/peoples involved, perhaps more than any other transfer in recent times.
    We as football fans are incredibly excited by the Torres capture and the promise of goals and football excellence the guy has shown for both club and country, but that’s as far as it goes. I can, hand on heart confirm that myself or any my fellow fans will never become as contorted with anger and ire as i have witnessed from both LFC fans and “Legends” recently….frankly we have other, bigger and more important things to worry about….!
    If Drogba, Lamps or Terry were to move on…which they obviously will at some point..they will go with our blessing and gratitude, if they were to return with other clubs i can confirm, as others before them they will be welcomed back as whole heartedly as when they ran onto the pitch for us in bygone days.
    I’m guessing through hard times in the past you guys have clung to your football and it has been a relief in overcoming the doldrums of economic strife, a religion unifying all from the daily struggle.
    Well we as Chelsea fans haven’t really had to experience that, so again i’m guessing this is why you are taking things a little bit too seriously with this guy, who let’s face it is trying to earn a living doing what he loves…in a very small window in his life, when and where it’s at all possible.

    Why can’t you all just give the guy a break, loyalty and honour is a two way thing, he was let down a few times before he turned his back on you.

    Anyway apologies if i’ve rambled a bit…a tad pissed at the moment and all the best for the season.
    Bye the way i think you have made a couple of great signings…Carroll with the right guidance will lead the England line within three years…Cheers. A

  • Steve Palmer says:

    It has been reported that the timing of Torres’ announcement and the transfer request were tied in with the capture of Suarez’s signature and DICTATED by Liverpool, so why the player is held accountable I fail to see. Surely you (everyone) will appreciate that much activity takes place before these things go public?

    • Alex Hess says:

      I agree with the last part, yes – we can’t be sure of what may have gone on behind the scenes prior to any ‘official’ approach, but I was under the firm impression that the Club signed Suarez to play alongside Torres, not as a direct replacement.

  • Zahid says:

    I feel let down by Fernando, i wouldn’t have minded if he had left in the summer but it was his timing. But oh well we all have to move on, theres a new era at Anfield a few new reasons to be optimisitic for our future, Andy Carroll, Luis El-Pistolero Suarez, King Kenny and our new owners.

    I see that Fernandos website changed overnight from Red of LFC to Blue of Chavski, but its good to see hes still supporting the Liverpool Disabled Supporters Association……YNWA

  • Dale Marlow says:

    I also notice this myth, being put about that he deliberately did not perform at the heights he did when he first arrived during the last 18 months, well if he did, it cost him a place in the Spanish World Cup winning side and has tainted his on field reputation as he’s struggled with injuries.

    I think we need to get a sense of realism and accept we don’t know all the facts and have been fortunate that the timing of his departure and the circumstances around it have left us with two terrific strikers and more money to spend in the summer.

    Good luck Nando, not all reds are bitter with what you’ve done.

Comments are closed.