Quantcast
View from the Kop

Perhaps selling him is not as ludicrous as many seem to think

|
Image for Perhaps selling him is not as ludicrous as many seem to think

Following the signing of Jordan Henderson, and with widespread reports suggesting that Blackpool’s Charlie Adam is closing in on a switch to Anfield. Speculation is growing concerning the future role of Raul Meireles at Liverpool Football Club. According to TalkSport amongst others, reports in Italy claim that Inter Milan are reportedly preparing a bid in the region of £14m for Meireles.

Opinions amongst Liverpool fans seem divided on the idea of a prospective sale of the 28 year old Portuguese international, who after an inauspicious start as a part of Roy Hodgson’s struggling side – ended the season as PFA Fans Player of the Year as part of a resurgent Liverpool side guided by Kenny Dalglish.

This article looks at the arguments for and against the sale of Meireles by asking where he fits in relation to Dalglish and Comolli’s summer recruitment drive.

Meireles is one of Liverpool’s better attack-minded central midfielders. He has great invention, can pick a pass & he makes good positive attacking runs. Defensively however, he is woeful – bloody woeful…. he has a tendency to drift out of games and to make poor decisions – both on and off the ball.

It is Meireles’ unpredictability on the ball which is both his best – and worst attribute. Meireles is frustrating in that he often tries the more elaborate pass when in possession – rather than the simple ball to feet. This has the effect of taking sting out of the quick tempo of Liverpool’s attacking play, for example by lofting short range passes to a team-mate at knee, waist or chest height. Meireles loves to ‘clip’ or ‘loft’ such passes, which are tougher for a team mate to both anticipate and/or control, often breaking up a good spell of crisp passing. If I was a team mate of his I’d imagine it would get frustrating. Expect ‘hospital passes’ aplenty. Raul also has a tendency to dwell on the ball for too long, often losing possession in the process.

However, on his day, Raul can also be a match-winner. Kind of like a central midfield version of Luis Garcia if you will. Frustrating, but occasionally capable of wonderful things.

The dilemma facing Liverpool at the moment is that with Steven Gerrard, Meireles, Jordan Henderson and Jonjo Shelvey all on the books, they have a lot of players vying for the attacking central midfield position. (not to mention Aquilani or the possible arrival of Adam)

Henderson is an interesting signing for Liverpool – but questions remain. Is he a £13-20m (depending which estimate you believe) third-choice attacking central midfielder behind Gerrard and Meireles in the pecking order? This seems very doubtful – perhaps he is also penned in as cover for right midfield as well being seen as a central midfield option? If this is the case, in my opinion anything that keeps Dirk away from the flanks is an improvement.

To the best of my knowledge, Henderson does not need to be registered as one of Liverpool’s 25-man squad until the 2012/13 season, as he is under 21. On paper the options of Gerrard, Meireles and Henderson competing for the attacking central midfield role appear as good a set of options as any club in England. Shelvey could possibly be loaned out for the season and by the time 12/13 rolls around, he could theoretically be ready to stake a claim for a midfield berth – as such, the club could reassess Meireles & Gerrard’s roles next summer.

This scenario would suggest that in the medium-term, Liverpool have good options in the attacking central midfield area. So why get Adam and lose Meireles?

Continue Reading on Page 2 . . .

Share this article

27 comments

  • vinod says:

    Exellent article..true 100 percent..we need fighter like gerrard ,suarez ,kuyt,carrager,caroll,..all over the pitch.liverpool need fighters all around the pitch.maxi ,jcole and mereles are players who plas good when the whole team plays good..Adam is a fighter and can control the midfield better than raul mereles..but i prefer fernando gago more than adam due to his technical ability.

  • Lewis says:

    No thx. Adam is lazy, quite the opposite of a fighter. Meireles can tackle and run, Adam can’t do neither. Meireles > Adam > Henderson. We MUST keep Meireles. Top player.

    • Chris says:

      A well written article, but some of the statements don’t really tie in with reality. I don’t think many people would agree that Meireles played a wide role better than Kuyt. While many people don’t like Kuyt on the wing, he has proven to be one of our most effective players over the last few years. Meireles on the other hand, rarely looked comfortable when playing out wide. He was more effective when pushing forward in a free role.

      I don’t think he is as bad defensively as the author suggests, he plays the central midfield role for Portugal. He was out-muscled on occasion but once he is more used to the premier league, he’d adapt.

      I hope we keep him, and get Adam. Adam could provide balance in a 4-3-3 as we don’t have any other central midfielders that are left footed. Aurelio was often deployed as the 3rd midfielder om 4-3-3 (when fit).

  • Loverpool says:

    If u want unexciting predictable football support another team. Miereles is unpredicatable but exciting. Like Suarez who often looses the ball and wayward passes. A whole team like these would be a mess. A whole team of predictable SOLID players would be boring. A mixture if the 2 is good. Yes sign the Britsh boring solid players but sign some unpredictable exciting foreigners too. YNWA

  • Umer says:

    To be honest he won’t make into the midfield of the other top 4 sides. He is good but shy in the tackle, Adam is an obvious upgrade, he can put in a tackle and is great on set pieces.

    • loverpool says:

      “umer …u fool! Adam an upgrade…Meireles is twice the footballer of Adam…Also had the brains to clear a good few goals off the goal line.

  • gentle 4r nig says:

    get gago insted

  • Eric says:

    The only reason Kenny is thinking of selling Meireles is because he does not fit his ridiculous policy of being young and British. Without Meireles last season the team would not have finished 6th and some so called fans have no idea of how much he contributed to the team’s cause. Apart from Gerrard, who was injured most of the time, Meireles was the only midfielder who possessed the creativity, vision and range of passing. It would make no sense to sell a Portuguese international who made such a large contribution to the team.

    The signing of Henderson and possibly Adam should not signal the departure of Meireles. Henderson has potential to be a fantastic box to box midfielder but at this stage he is nowhere near as good as Meireles in terms of technical ability and range of passing. I do not expect Henderson to come in and walk straight into the side and replace Meireles. Adam is clearly inferior to Meireles. The only reason he has shined is because he has been the big fish in the small pond in a rubbish Blackpool team filled with League One standard players. Adam is not cut for Liverpool and it would be ludicrous if Kenny was to sell Meireles just to make way for Adam.

    Kenny should seriously forget about the overrated Adam. Meireles is a much better player who offers more quality in midfield than Adam. Kenny should be looking to sell the likes of Poulsen, Spearing and Aquilani instead. It would make no sense whatsoever to sell Meireles.

  • @dk_matrix says:

    The every first thing I thought when I heard about that £14m bid, was his age and his defensive incapacities – take the cash. He sure is an exciting talent, but sometimes financially, it may not necessarily be the best option. If we remember, we are still in a transition period which last for 2 to 3 years. We must not be impatient. In King Kenny we trust. JFT96 & YNWA!

  • Bomber25 says:

    British midfielders are not very good at keeping a football; it would be wise to remember that before getting rid of Meireles.

    • papa says:

      I do not agree. I think the teams that finished top four all had british midfielders.

  • Liv4Life says:

    Mereiles was Liverpools best attacking midfielder last season.. he was crucial in Liverpool’s turn of fortune with brilliant goals vs Everton and Chelsea. And sell a player that has contributed so much for one that possibly doesn’t suit a top tier team? Yes Adams is good, but is he made for Liverpool? I mean, Roy was a top coach, but did not suit Liverpool, top for the lower class teams like WB, Fulham. Same goes for Adams. Mereiles has international experience. And who says he is weak defensively? He has prevented many goals going in last season (atleast as far as i remember) by saving on the goal line.

    • papa says:

      Best attacking midfielder out of how many attacking midfielders??? The goals he scored for us against Everton and Chelsea were made possible because of the position he played in. Kenny’s wisdom. We sold Torres after he did so much for us and I, for one, am glad we did. And he is weak defensively which is why he was never left in the middle on his own, always had a player behind him to watch his back. I Like Mereiles but I agree with the writer, say thanks for your contribution but times are changing and you don’t want to spend the majority of next season on the bench. That would not be fair to him.

  • Eric says:

    Kenny Dalglish will not win Premier League if he is going to replace a top talent like Meireles with overrated British players like Adam. If Liverpool are to stand any chance of getting back into the top four they need to forget about this ridiculous transfer policy of targeting young but clearly overrated British players. Kenny needs to keep Meireles, a top midfielder, and look to bring in world class foreign talent like Mata. Forget about overrated and overpriced British players like Adam and Downing, these guys are not the sort of quality that will get the team back into the top four.

  • cris says:

    we need to keep meireless for next season.there is no need to sign adam we can use that money to sign juan mata.adams is overrated if he good why didnt he help his team blackpool to escaped relegation.we need to use some of that money to increase his wage.

    • Gerrardious says:

      chris, i would have loved to give a reply to ur childish comment but u’ll need to learn ur tenses first.

      • Billyboy says:

        Hmm. I think you should re-read your own comment and decide whether or not it was wise to criticise someone else’s grammar or punctuation, pal. “ur”? What are you, 12?

  • Paul says:

    The reason we have this discussion is because Inter “allegedly” has a £14m for him. Perhaps they did (or did not) so seeing that we would have a surplus in midfield according to our transfer activities this summer. Nothing really indicates that we wanted to sell him.

  • barry says:

    Quality player – We certainly need another defensive player like him to compete with Lucas & Spearing. A shame about the homesickness though, Unfortunately it doesn’t look too promising.

    • barry says:

      hehe – If you’re confused – the above comment was intended for the Gago article.

  • Toby says:

    14m for Mereiles. The kitty still has another 40 odd mil.

    Sell only on the proviso that you’re bringing in someone clearly better.

    Makes sense to sell given fair play next year. He’d be 29

  • barry says:

    Thanks for the comments folks. Personally I do admire Meireles’ attacking qualities – and like many of you, Adam is not exactly my dream signing either – but I’m not in charge at the club and the Adam move is looking increasingly likely. I was just trying to see the positives Adam could bring to the side – he could turn out be a great player for us, and it does seem Meireles will have a lot of competition next year.

    I didn’t mean to be so hard on Kuyt either Chris,sorry – but I’m pretty sure most of us would agree that neither Kuyt or Meireles is the answer on the right. It’s difficult to predict how we’ll line-up next year – Kenny is full of surprises after all, but I strongly feel that the Carroll factor will mean a 4-4-2 next year. Under Dalglish however, a 4-4-2 will anything but ‘rigid’ – I have high hopes, but we’ll see!

    Cheers again for the responses and opinions folks. Funny stuff this football writing – the first story I write and some guy on another site has accused me of being “a hack who is out to destroy Liverpool….” lol. It’s a cut-throat world out there – I meant no harm! If he only knew how much I love the ‘Pool!!!

  • THISISANFIELD says:

    EVER BANEGA
    dont need to say anything more

  • Jeeten says:

    do any of you remember the times where he played alongside Lucas in central midfield? Raul was never a (good) attacking midfielder. the times that he played alongside Lucas was probably the most effective role that he was given, so i think, if he were to stay, he would be paired with Lucas in a 4-2-3-1 formation, with Gerrard in front him. One of his better attributes is his distribution so it would make sense if he were to play that role instead of a more attacking one (We have Gerrard for that). That is his role in Porto and Portugal, so why change what is already comfortable to him?

Comments are closed.